Xkcd acceptable dating ages
Anyway, this formula precludes same-aged children dating before both are 14 (the range becomes negative below that), which may sound a bit weird but isn't particularly creepy. I remember that a cute girl in my grade was hitting on me back in elementary school. And when it has gone past I will turn the inner eye to see its path... I shall have to tell Ben that he's not the only Creepy Old Man out there though, i think he'll enjoy that.Perhaps the function should be extended as: f(x) = x for x Fear is the little-death that brings total obliteration. Only I will remain.heh, I like this one a lot, especially since I just started dating a 32 year old (I'm 21...) My friends and I like teasing him about the rather large age difference between us. I've shown him some XKCD comics before, and I think he'll appreciate this one also.heh, I like this one a lot, especially since I just started dating a 32 year old (I'm 21...) My friends and I like teasing him about the rather large age difference between us. That's why I used "actively seeking a partner" above. Or, I can just cope with being in a creepy relationship. She was immature for her age and I was mature for mine. We met in person for the first time at the UO World Faire (before we started dating). But then I went off to college and didn't have enough time for MMOs anymore and we broke up.Increases the probabilities somewhat, but maybe to the point of having to look for only 40-50 years instead of 67. In fact, I'll be disobeying it for another 8 years... *sniff*you also have to factor in the increasing (with age) percentages of your eligible dating pool who are:(a) single because they have Serious Issues and should thus be avoided,or(b) single because having been involved with people from group (a), they are now broken, bitter shells of human almost 28 (and with a much reduced dating pool to start with, at an optimistic 10% of 50% of the population within my non-creepy age range), i try to hold out hope that there's a signficant number left in group (c): people who are just unlucky.(And this also supports my thesis that men's "dating pools" are wish lists, and women's "dating pools" are queues.)I don't get why everyone is saying that 14 year olds can't date under this formula. but i'm also not sure how much longer it's going to take me to transition from group (b) to group (c)sigh.Just look at it in terms of a smaller unit of time (say months, or days) and add 7 years under that unit, instead of just adding 7. I'm going to have to agree that "too-crazy-to-date" variable needs to be taken into account when considering the available pool.
But I should also be working and I'm not doing that either. It dilutes the dating pool for those of us who don't like that.
Don't date anyone who is as old as or younger than your first child.
This really doesn't really come into play until around 50 or so.
Considering that we are on forums it's likely that any girl reading them holds a larger chance to fall in the latter category than a random selection of the population...
So, any females on here fall in the range of [(25.992/2 7), (25.992-7)*2] who live in the Iowa or Minnesota and is looking for a date this friday?